Non-Conformist Aliens Wanted
It occurred to me the other day that many fictional alien species conform to a small number of body plans: humanoid, insectoid, feline, robot, and reptilian. There’s a huge amount of creativity in appearances and cultures, admittedly, but most races out there fit one of those body plans. The Wikipedia list of fictional aliens is a good overview, for the above and other body plans, though it’s definitely not complete.
I realize there are reasons why most aliens are humanoid or nearly so. It’s easier to sympathize with something that looks human. It’s easier to conceive of aliens based on familiar Earth species. It’s easier to put make-up on an actor than to deal with CGI, or it was until recently. Still, why doesn’t more science fiction push the envelope? Why don’t we see more unusual body plans? It’s not as though we’d have to create entirely new physiologies, though we need those too. Earth has a whole host of creatures that have been underutilized in science fiction, including a few with proven intelligence.
Sharks, for instance, are ancient. They have cartilage instead of bone. They sense electricity and have an excellent sense of smell. They have problem-solving and social skills. There are documented cases of parthenogenesis. They’re built for predation and we’re already conditioned to cast them as villains.
Octopuses, corvids, parrots, and dolphins also have intelligence, or at least use tools and solve problems. Ravens can mimic sounds and have a wide range of calls, often for social purposes. Parrots are capable of communicating with humans. Dolphins have proto-language as well and are highly social. When was the last time you saw them (or parrots, or octopuses, or sharks) cast as aliens? Well, except for Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy…. Other possible species include: horseshoe crabs, trilobites, rabbits, elephants, slime molds, moss, bacterial hive-minds, and marsupials, including monotremes.
And as I mentioned above, we need more entirely new physiologies too. Species that don’t match up with the Earth life we’re familiar with, or even with our extremeophiles. If we make the environment first, the species second…
One possible environment, close to home: the diamond oceans of Uranus and Neptune. This would be a hot, high pressure place to live. There probably wouldn’t be a lot of gas mixed into the diamond, let alone oxygen, so either the aliens wouldn’t breathe, they’d use a system like photosynthesis where they’d break down carbon for energy, or they’d be like whales, surfacing to breathe hydrogen, helium, or methane (those being the abundant gases). The aliens would almost certainly be carbon-based, and would consume other carbon-based life for energy. They’d likely evolve something like fins or flagella to propel themselves. Maybe they’d use jet propulsion.
There’s no reason why these aliens couldn’t evolve intelligence or even civilization, though I doubt they’d achieve buildings as we know them, because short of building on the solid-diamond floes, there’d be nothing solid, and the caps probably wouldn’t be all that stable. I can see floating structures tethered together, however, provided the aliens had something to build with. Perhaps after millennia of them using these structures, they’d adapt to them, becoming more amphibious than aquatic or losing the flippers and gaining something more like hands. Or perhaps not.
I have no idea what first contact will look like when we make it. The realistic version, of us finding microbes on Mars or one of Jupiter’s moons, lacks a certain something, though I’ll be pleased when it happens. But wouldn’t it be great if we ran into alien blue jays or giant platypuses or sentient hammerhead sharks?
An earlier, rougher version of this essay was posted on my blog, Specnology.



See, this is why my favorite aliens are the Tralfamadorians in Kurt Vonnegut’s work. You never actually get to see them because they live in 4 dimensions.
Don’t we all live in four dimensions (vertical, horizontal, depth, time)?
Oh, and I wouldn’t say that octopoid aliens are “underused” considering the popularity of Cthulhu knockoffs, and how completely bizarre some of Lovecraft’s other Eldritch Abominations looked.
Most of the species you list have been used in SF/F. Random examples:
Sharks: A Spy in Europa (Alastair Reynolds)
Rabbits: Watership Down (Richard Adams)
Elephants: White Bone (Barbara Gowdy)
Trilobites: Mission of Gravity (Hal Clement)
Hive-minds: a lot of SF, including the Borg
Corvids: a lot of SF/F, including Crow (James O’Barr)
Mosses: Your Haploid Heart (James Tiptree, Jr)
There’s the sentient ocean of Lem’s Solaris, the sentient ecosystem of Le Guin’s Vaster than Empires and More Slow, the neutron star cheela in Forward’s Dragon’s Egg, the kangaroo-like aliens in a harrowing story whose title I cannot recall right now… I could go on at considerable length.
Far more problematic is the fact that most aliens are still given human habits and mindsets. I still recall the silicon Horta in The Devil in the Dark — a neato concept, until they gave it mammalian maternal instincts. It’s harder to think alien thoughts than create alien anatomies, novel F/X tech notwithstanding.
The “Starfish Aliens” page of TVTropes is a long list of Extraterrestrials that at least look very different from most Terran life.:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StarfishAliens
The aliens in Eric Flint’s “Mother of Demons” (available as a free e-book from Baen publishing’s Free Library) are pure land animals, but evolved from squid-like marine ancestors.
And Sam Starfall from Free Fall, one of the hardest science fiction webcomics around, is despite his deceptively humanoid animatronic environment suit actually a squid analogue hailing from a planet that didn’t experience as many extinction level events as Earth. Sam is therefore composed of really simple proteins easily digested by most terrestrial life forms, making him a potential prey to even the most timid animals.
From an article I’m about to publish on “hard” SF:
“I’ve read too many SF stories that trumpet themselves “hard” because they get the the details of planetary orbits right while their biology or sociology would make a child laugh – or an adult weep.”
From your description, it seems that Free Fall falls in this category.
The author of Freefall, Mark Stanley, prides himself on not having any “magic” technology in comic except for a severely limited FTL drive. So yeah kindof. Though he has posted details on Sam and Florence (an uplifted Red Wolf) that make it sound to most people like he’s done the research (admittedly, so did Michael Crichton):
Sam: http://nice.purrsia.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=21;t=002396
Florence: http://nice.purrsia.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=21;t=002367
It seems a bit unfair to group a long list of aliens under “insectoid” and then complain there isn’t more creativity out there. It’s a bit like grouping most of the others under “mammalian”. Insects and other arthropods represent a huge amount of diversity of form and biology. I think there’s plenty more room for creative use of them as inspiration for alien biology.
I’ve never understood why I see people downplay what it would mean to find even microbial life on Mars or another body. For all of our speculation, every single speck of life we know exists is right here on Earth. We simply don’t know if there’s life of any kind, anywhere else in the whole vast universe. Finding anything identifiable as biological life elsewhere would be a world-changing event. (Even better than the confirmation of extrasolar planets, one of the biggest discoveries of the twentieth century.)
Good old Hal Clement. “Needle” had one of my all-time favorite aliens, an intelligent four-pound gelatinous mass, evolved from viruses, and able to symbiotically inhabit and communicate with a multi-celled organism (such as a human being).